Sole F65 vs Horizon 7.4 AT (2026): Which Is Better for Jogging?

Horizon 7.4 AT and Sole F65 treadmills side by side in a home
Horizon 7.4 AT vs Sole F65 compared. (Illustration, not an actual product photo.)

The Sole F65 and Horizon 7.4 AT are folding treadmills with nearly identical core specs: a 22 ร— 60-inch deck, 0.5โ€“12 mph, 0โ€“15% incline, a 350-lb rating, 10 programs, Bluetooth and lifetime frame and motor coverage. The 7.4 AT adds a 3.5 CHP motor, QuickDial controls, zoned cushioning and much longer parts and labor coverage; the F65 is the more affordable, lighter and lower model.

The F65 ranks #2 in our best treadmill for jogging guide and #2 in our best value treadmill guide. The 7.4 AT ranks #1 in our best durable treadmill and best treadmill for heavy runners guides and #2 in our best treadmill for HIIT guide. For more on the Sole, read our Sole F65 review.

Quick Verdict

Overall winner for jogging: Horizon 7.4 AT. On the same deck size and incline range, it adds a stronger motor, QuickDial controls for quick pace changes and 5 years on parts and 2 years on labor. The Sole F65 is the better fit if you jog at a steady pace, want to spend less and need a lighter, lower machine.

Winner

BEST OVERALL

Horizon 7.4 AT

Horizon 7.4 AT treadmill

FitScore 85.7/100

Choose it if you mix in intervals and want the longest parts and labor coverage.

Read our full Horizon 7.4 AT review

BEST VALUE

Sole F65

Sole F65 treadmill

FitScore 82.2/100

Choose it if you jog at a steady pace and want a lighter, more affordable folder.

Read our full Sole F65 review

Head-to-Head Specs

Here are the two models side by side, based on the manufacturer and Amazon listings. A check mark shows the stronger spec on each line.

Horizon 7.4 AT vs Sole F65 head-to-head specifications
Comparehead to headWinnerBEST OVERALL
Horizon 7.4 AT treadmill
Horizon 7.4 ATFitScore85.7/100
BEST VALUE
Sole F65 treadmill
Sole F65FitScore82.2/100
Motor3.5 CHP โœ“3.0 HP (as listed)
Speed0.5โ€“12 mph0.5โ€“12 mph
Incline0โ€“15%0โ€“15%
Running Surface22 ร— 60 in22 ร— 60 in
Weight Capacity350 lb350 lb
Cushioning3-Zone Variable ResponseCushioned deck
Console8.25-in LCD9-in backlit LCD (as listed) โœ“
Programs1010, including 2 heart rate programs
Footprint76 ร— 37 in77 ร— 36 in
Folded Size42 ร— 37 ร— 71 in48 ร— 36 ร— 66 in
Product WeightAbout 318 lbAbout 267 lb โœ“
WarrantyLifetime frame and motor, 5-yr parts, 2-yr labor โœ“Lifetime frame and motor, 1-yr parts, 90-day labor
Specs won (โœ“)
Lines where the model has the stronger spec; ties count for neither
2 of 122 of 12
Check PriceCheck Price on AmazonCheck Price on Amazon

Check Amazon for current pricing and availability.

FitScore Duel

Both scores use the weights of our best treadmill for jogging guide: comfort 30%, performance 25%, durability 20%, practicality and features 10% each, affordability 5%. Joggers spend long, steady sessions on the deck, so comfort counts most, followed by a smooth motor and a frame that lasts. The 7.4 AT is not ranked in that guide, so its score uses the same weights. Both models score the same on comfort; the 7.4 AT pulls ahead on durability, performance and features, while the F65 leads on affordability, which explains the 3.5-point gap.

Horizon 7.4 AT

FitScore for Jogging
85.7/100
Performance
96
Durability
95
Comfort
88
Practicality
57
Features
81
Affordability
50

Sole F65

FitScore for Jogging
82.2/100
Performance
92
Durability
83
Comfort
88
Practicality
56
Features
73
Affordability
65

Key Differences

  • The 7.4 AT lists a 3.5 CHP motor; the Amazon listing shows 3.0 HP for the F65.
  • The 7.4 AT has QuickDial speed and incline controls on the handlebars.
  • The 7.4 AT uses 3-zone Variable Response cushioning; the F65 lists a cushioned deck.
  • The 7.4 AT covers parts for 5 years and labor for 2; the F65 covers parts for 1 year and labor for 90 days.
  • The F65 is about 51 lb lighter, 8 inches lower when assembled and folds to 66 inches tall instead of 71.
  • Deck size, speed, incline, weight limit and frame and motor coverage are the same.

Motor and Interval Response

Both run from 0.5 to 12 mph and climb to 15%, more than enough for jogging and hill walks. The 7.4 AT lists a 3.5 CHP RapidSync motor and QuickDial controls for fast speed and incline changes. The F65’s Amazon listing shows a 3.0 HP motor, while other sources list 3.25 HP, so check the current listing.

Owners like how quickly the 7.4 AT speeds up and its direct controls for intervals, though one high-mileage runner finds deceleration relatively slow, and another sometimes bumps the QuickDial controls by accident. We have not seen independent hands-on tests of the current F65; testers expect slower speed and incline changes based on other Sole models, which matters less for steady jogging.

Winner: Horizon 7.4 AT

Deck and Cushioning

Both list a 22 ร— 60-inch running surface, roomy enough for longer strides. The 7.4 AT uses 3-zone Variable Response cushioning; owners rate its deck comfort favorably, and testers found it comfortable without being soft, with subtle flex underfoot.

The F65 lists a cushioned deck. Sole treadmills in general have a reputation for sturdy frames and a firm deck, so expect a solid rather than bouncy feel. Both score the same for comfort in our jogging weights.

Winner: Tie

Console, Programs and Apps

The F65 lists a 9-inch backlit LCD and 10 programs, including two heart rate control programs, and connects over Bluetooth to speakers, heart rate monitors and the SOLE+ app and other fitness apps. Its console has changed across versions, so check the current listing.

The 7.4 AT has an 8.25-inch LCD, 10 programs, contact heart rate grips, Bluetooth speakers, a USB charging port and a device rest for your tablet. Owners like using it with Zwift without a subscription. Neither has a touchscreen.

Winner: Tie

Footprint, Weight and Folding

Both need about 76โ€“77 ร— 36โ€“37 inches of floor space. The F65 weighs about 267 lb and stands 55 inches tall assembled; the 7.4 AT weighs about 318 lb and stands 63 inches tall.

The 7.4 AT folds to a shorter 42-inch depth but stands about 71 inches tall when folded, against 48 ร— 66 inches for the F65. Testers found the 7.4 AT’s assembly long, with fiddly cable routing, and advise building it where it will stay.

Winner: Sole F65

Build and Warranty

Independent testers describe the 7.4 AT as stable, with solid mechanics and good ergonomics, and one owner reports several thousand kilometers without problems. Buyers call it gym-quality, though feedback on reliability, assembly and belt tracking is mixed, with some reports of the belt drifting to one side.

Both list lifetime frame and motor coverage. The 7.4 AT adds 5 years on parts and 2 years on labor, against 1 year and 90 days for the F65.

Winner: Horizon 7.4 AT

Who Should Buy Each

Joggers who add intervals: Choose the Horizon 7.4 AT for QuickDial controls, zoned cushioning and 5 years on parts and 2 on labor.

Steady-pace joggers: Choose the Sole F65 for the same deck, incline and weight limit in a lighter, lower and more affordable frame.

Consider Instead

If you want Horizon’s QuickDial controls and zoned cushioning in a lighter frame, look at the Horizon 7.0 AT, our #1 pick in the best value treadmill guide. It has a 20 ร— 60-inch deck, a 3 HP motor, 15% incline, an included Bluetooth chest strap and weighs about 257 lb.

Final Verdict

For jogging at home, the Horizon 7.4 AT is the better treadmill: the same deck and incline as the F65, plus a stronger motor, QuickDial controls, zoned cushioning and much longer parts and labor coverage. Choose the Sole F65 if you jog at a steady pace and value a lighter, lower and more affordable machine.

Horizon 7.4 AT vs Sole F65 FAQ

For jogging, yes. It adds a 3.5 CHP motor, QuickDial controls, zoned cushioning and 5 years on parts. The F65 is lighter and more affordable.

Both have a 22 ร— 60-inch deck, 12 mph, 15% incline and a 350-lb rating. The 7.4 AT has a stronger motor, quicker controls and a longer warranty; the F65 is lighter, lower and has two heart rate control programs.

No. Both include built-in programs and connect to fitness apps over Bluetooth without a required plan.

The F65, at about 267 lb against about 318 lb for the 7.4 AT.

Yes. The 7.4 AT folds to about 42 ร— 37 ร— 71 inches and the F65 to about 48 ร— 36 ร— 66 inches.

The 7.4 AT. Both cover the frame and motor for life, but the 7.4 AT adds 5 years on parts and 2 years on labor, against 1 year and 90 days for the F65.

This article contains affiliate links. If you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. We do not show prices because they change constantly: product details and availability can change at any time, so please check the current price and details directly on Amazon. Learn more. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.